 |


 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
Not today, but back in the 1980s for deliberately leaking classified information because he was opposed to President Reagan's policies.
“LEAKY” LEAHY: CARELESS WITH INTELLIGENCE FLASHBACK: Sen. Patrick “Leaky” Leahy Forced To Resign Intelligence Committee Post Because Of Loose Lips:
Leahy Was Forced To Resign From The Senate Intelligence Committee After Leaking Information On The Iran-Contra Investigation. “Sen. Patrick Leahy’s admission that he resigned from the Intelligence Committee this year for ‘carelessly’ exposing the panel’s draft report on the Iran-Contra investigation comes at a time of increased political tension over the issue of leaks to the news media.” (George Lobsenz, United Press International, 7/29/87)
- “Leahy Asserted His Only Goal Was To Prove That The Draft ‘Was Being Held Up Because There Were Major Gaps And Other Problems With It, And Not Because Of A Desire To Embarrass The President.’ He Said He Was ‘Angry With Himself For Carelessly Allowing The Press Person To Examine The Unclassified Draft.’” (George Lobsenz, United Press International, 7/29/87)
- “Behavior Like This Earned For Him The Sobriquet, ‘Leaky Leahy.’” (Jay Nordlinger, “The ‘Nastiest’ Democrat: Sen. Patrick Leahy, Republican Nightmare,” National Review, 7/9/01) “Also, In The ‘80’s, Leahy Gained Some Notoriety As A Member Of The Intelligence Committee. He Was Charged With Revealing Classified Information During The Achille Lauro Terrorist Incident, Outraging Administration Officials.” (Jay Nordlinger, “The ‘Nastiest’ Democrat: Sen. Patrick Leahy, Republican Nightmare,” National Review, 7/9/01)
Just one of the many reasons why groups like the CIA stopped handing out information to just anyone in Congress and why Leahy is the last person to be calling for "truth" commissions.
Update: the super secret super evil plan the super evil Republicans kept from Congress? The New York Times published at least one article about it back in 2002. Oops!
 Current Mood : determined  Tags : democrats, hypocrisy, patrick leahy, scandals, senate Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
Remember when the Democrats pretended to be worried about $1 trillion in debt?
Remember when the Democrats pretended to be worried about the paltry deficits of the Bush era?
Too bad, because deficits are so yesterday! Today's Democrat knows that deficits don't matter. After all, if someone like Paul Krugman, who used to rant and rave about Bush's deficits bringing about disaster, is not worried about Obama's significantly higher deficits (six times as much!) then why should we worry? (And Obama isn't even through spending for this year.)
Have I mentioned lately how good it is to be deeply into gold at this point?
 Current Mood : amused  Tags : democrats, federal deficit, hypocrisy, obama administration, paul krugman Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
We already knew that Ruth Bader Ginsburg has a penchant for issuing reality-challenged rulings based on straw-man arguments. Now in an interview in the New York Times she openly admits to not just supporting eugenics but also believing that abortion (and it's legalization) was a way to fulfill that vision.
JUSTICE GINSBURG: Yes, the ruling about that surprised me. [Harris v. McRae — in 1980 the court upheld the Hyde Amendment, which forbids the use of Medicaid for abortions.] Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of. So that Roe was going to be then set up for Medicaid funding for abortion. Which some people felt would risk coercing women into having abortions when they didn’t really want them. But when the court decided McRae, the case came out the other way. And then I realized that my perception of it had been altogether wrong. Wow...using the government to get rid of "undesirable" populations. Right out of Margaret Sanger's teachings!
And there are also little gems like this:
Q: The case ties together themes of women’s equality and reproductive freedom. The court split those themes apart in Roe v. Wade. Do you see, as part of a future feminist legal wish list, repositioning Roe so that the right to abortion is rooted in the constitutional promise of sex equality?
JUSTICE GINSBURG: Oh, yes. I think it will be. Excuse me? What part of "gender equality" is served by an abortion? That because men don't "have" to be pregnant, neither do women? What kind of thought process is going on there? I think it is very revealing in all the talk about abortion in the article not once does Bader mention babies or children. Apparently there are only oppressed women and their patriarchal oppressors involved.
It's also revealing that she complains that a woman's "right to choose" shouldn't be given to the state where abortion is concerned but argues that exact opposite of that position when ownership of guns is the issue. Yet ownership of firearms is a clearly established right via the Second Amendment while abortion is not.
It's like I said: it's becoming impossible to distinguish between parody and actual statements from Democrats on the issues. They've simply dropped all pretense of hiding their real agenda: they want to run your life for you. Hey, it's only a bad thing if you disagree with them. :P
Welcome to the new slavery!
 Current Mood : determined  Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
They are the exact words of leading Democrats.
Rep. Alcee Hastings - the impeached Florida judge Nancy Pelosi tried to install as chairman of the House Intelligence Committee until her own party members rebelled - introduced an amendment to the defense authorization bill that gives Attorney General Eric Holder sole discretion to label groups that oppose government policy on guns, abortion, immigration, states’ rights, or a host of other issues. In a June 25 speech on the House floor, Rep. Trent Franks, R-AZ, blasted the idea: “This sounds an alarm for many of us because of the recent shocking and offensive report released by the Department of Homeland Security which labeled, arguably, a majority of Americans as ‘extremists.’”
Another Hastings bill (HR 645) authorizes $360 million in 2009 and 2010 to set up “not fewer than six national emergency centers on military installations” capable of housing “a large number of individuals affected by an emergency or major disaster.” But Section 2 (b) 4 allows the Secretary of Homeland Security to use the camps “to meet other appropriate needs” - none of which are specified. This is the kind of blank check that Congress should never, ever sign. You see, a "conspiracy theory" is an allegation not backed up by facts; like the allegation that President Bush was trampling everyone's Constitutional rights.
Posting quotes from Democrats isn't a conspiracy theory.
Hope this helps!
 Current Mood : determined  Tags : alcee hastings, big brother, big lie, democrats, scandals Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
I'll just leave this here.

 Current Mood : amused  Tags : barack obama Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |


 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
Ganked from myndcryme!
I Still Hate You, Sarah Palin The Republicans bring a knife to a gunfight, and lose again.
By David Kahane
One of the most terrifying moments of my political life came last summer at the Republican convention in St. Paul. No, I don’t mean seeing John McCain careering around the Xcel Energy Center like Eyegore in Young Frankenstein, his face frozen in a Lon Chaney Sr. rictus grin as he reached across the aisle to his erstwhile friends in the media and got his hand bitten off. Rather, I’m referring to the aftermath of Sarah Palin’s outrageous acceptance speech, which whipped up the Rotary Club delegates into a frenzy of white-boy fury that not even heckling by a brave Code Pink embed could deter. Truly a fascist classic and one that sent shivers down our collectivist spines.
Even worse was the glaze of horror on the phizzes of the assembled heroes of the Mainstream Media. Andrea Mitchell — yes, the very same Andrea Mitchell, NBC News, Washington, whose employer saw no conflict of interest at all when she married then Fed pooh-bah Alan Greenspan — stood there gaping like a frog while the rest of the assembled Finemans and Matthewses and Olbermanns scurried around like roaches when the light gets turned on: What the hell just hit us? For one horrible moment, it looked as if the carefully crafted plans of David Axelrod, Rahm Emanuel, George Soros, and the Second Chief Directorate, first department, of the old KGB were about to gang agley.
Not only were we offended at the sheer effrontery of McCain’s pick: How dare the Republicans proffer this déclassée piece of Wasilla trailer trash whose only claim to fame was that she didn’t exercise her right to choose? Where were her degrees from Smith or Barnard, her internships at PETA, the Brookings Institution, or the Young Pioneers? We were also outraged that the Stupid Party had just nominated a completely unqualified candidate nobody had ever heard of, a first-term governor of Alaska whose previous experience consisted of a small-town mayoralty. As opposed to our guy, Barry Soetoro of Mombasa, Djakarta, and Honolulu, a first-term senator nobody had ever heard of, whose previous experience had been as a state senator (D., Daley Machine) in Illinois. After eight long, illegitimate, lawless years of &*^%BUSH$#@! tyranny, how dare you contest this election?
And so the word went out, from that time and place: Eviscerate Sarah Palin like one of her field-dressed moose. Turn her life upside down. Attack her politics, her background, her educational history. Attack her family. Make fun of her husband, her children. Unleash the noted gynecologist Andrew Sullivan to prove that Palin’s fifth child was really her grandchild. Hit her with everything we have: Maureen Dowd of the New York Times, taking a beer-run break from her quixotic search for Mr. Right to drip venom on Sister Sarah; post-funny comic David Letterman, to joke about her and her daughters on national television; Katie Couric, the anchor nobody watches, to give this Alaskan interloper a taste of life in the big leagues; former New York Times hack Todd “Mr. Dee Dee Myers” Purdum, to act as an instrument of Graydon Carter’s wrath at Vanity Fair. Heck, we even burned her church down. Even after the teleological triumph of The One, the assault had to continue, each blow delivered with our Lefty SneerTM (viz.: Donny Deutsch yesterday on Morning Joe), until Sarah was finished.
You know what? It worked! McCain finally succumbed to his long-standing case of Stockholm Syndrome (“My friends, you have nothing to fear from an Obama presidency”), Tina Fey turned Palin into a see-Russia-from-my-house joke, “conservative” useful idiots like Peggy Noonan and Kathleen Parker hatched her, and finally Sarah cried No más and walked away. If we could, we’d cut off her head and mount it on a wall at Tammany Hall, except there is no more Tammany Hall unless you count Obama’s Tony Rezko–financed home in Chicago. And it took only eight months — heck, Sarah couldn't even have another kid in the time it took us to destroy her. That’s the Chicago way!
Yes, my friends, it’s once again time to quote Sean Connery’s famous speech from The Untouchables, written by David Mamet — the lecture the veteran Chicago cop gives a wet-behind-the-ears Eliot Ness (Kevin Costner, back when he was a movie star) while they sit in a church pew. “You want to get Capone? Here’s how you get him: he pulls a knife, you pull a gun, he sends one of yours to the hospital, you send one of his to the morgue. That’s the Chicago way!” If you just think of us — liberal Democrats — as Capone you’ll begin to understand what we’re up to. And we just put one of yours in the morgue.
I don’t know why I’m telling you this, but maybe now you’re beginning to understand the high-stakes game we’re playing here. This ain’t John McCain’s logrolling senatorial club any more. This is a deadly serious attempt to realize the vision of the 1960s and to fundamentally transform the United States of America. This is the fusion of Communist dogma, high ideals, gangster tactics, and a stunning amount of self-loathing. For the first time in history, the patrician class is deliberately selling its own country down the river just to prove a point: that, yes, we can! This country stinks and we won’t be happy until we’ve forced you to admit it.
In other words, stop thinking of the Democratic Party as merely a political party, because it’s much more than that. We’re not just the party of slavery, segregation, secularism, and sedition. Not just the party of Aaron Burr, Boss Tweed, Richard J. Croker, Bull Connor, Chris Dodd, Richard Daley, Bill Ayers, the Reverend Jeremiah Wright, and Emperor Barack Hussein Obama II. Not just the party of Kendall “Agent 202” Myers, the State Department official recruited as a Cuban spy along with his wife during the Carter administration. Rather, think of the Democratic Party as what it really is: a criminal organization masquerading as a political party.
If you had any sense, you would start using our tactics against us. After all, you have a few lawyers on your side. Sue us. File frivolous ethics complaints against all our elected officials until, like Sarah, they go broke from defending themselves. (David Paterson would be a good place to start.) Challenge the constitutionality of BO2’s legion of fill-in-the-blank czars — none of whom have to be confirmed, or even pass a security check. (Come to think of it, neither did Barry.) Let slip your own journalistic dogs of war, assuming you have any, to find Barry’s birth certificate, his college transcripts, whether he applied to Occidental as a foreign student, and on which passport he traveled in 1981 to Pakistan with his friend Wahid Hamid, for starters.
You might also want to think about interviewing New York literary agent Jane Dystel, who a) contacted the totally unknown Obama in the wake of an adulatory New York Times piece in 1990 and b) got him a $125,000 advance for a memoir that c) he couldn’t write, even after a long sojourn in Bali, which d) got the contract canceled, whereupon e) Dystel got him $40,000 from another publisher, following which f) the book finally came out to glowing reviews and g) Obama fired her. Wouldn’t she have an interesting story to tell?
Of course, you won’t. You’re too nice, too enamored of history and tradition to realize that the rules have changed. Remember, I live and work in a town where, “Hello, he lied,” isn’t a joke; we men of the Left are perfectly comfortable lying, cheating, and stealing — hello, Senator Franken! — in order to attain and keep political power. Not for nothing is one of our mottos, “By Any Means Necessary.” You see, we’re the good guys, and for us the ends always justify the means. We are, literally, shameless, which is why Bill Clinton is now a multi-millionaire and Eliot Spitzer is already on the comeback trail.
In Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals, “the fourth rule is: Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules.” This is the book that “Reset” Rodham (what ever happened to her?) and BHO II grew up reading and continue to live by. If you don’t understand that that’s the way we see you — as the enemy — then you’re too dumb to survive. Remember that for us politics is not just an avocation, or even just a job, but our life. We literally stay awake nights thinking up ways to screw you. And one of the ways we do that is by religiously observing Alinsky’s Rule No. 4.
Did Sarah stand for “family values”? Flay her unwed-mother daughter. Did she represent probity in a notoriously corrupt, one-family state? Spread rumors about FBI investigations. Did she speak with an upper-Midwest twang? Mock it relentlessly on Saturday Night Live. Above all, don’t let her motivate the half of the country that doesn’t want His Serene Highness to bankrupt the nation, align with banana-republic Communist dictators, unilaterally dismantle our missile defenses, and set foot in more mosques than churches since he has become president. We’ve got a suicide cult to run here.
And that’s why Sarah had to go. Whether she understood it or not, she threatened us right down to our most fundamental, meretricious, elitist, sneering, snobbish, insecure, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders bones. She was, after all, a “normal” American, the kind of person (or so I’m told) you meet in flyover country. The kind that worries first about home and hearth and believes in things like motherhood and love of country the way it is, not the way she wants to remake it.
What you clowns need, in other words, is a Rules for Radical Conservatives to explain what you’re up against and teach you how to compete before it’s too late. Luckily, since I care about money even more than I care about politics, I have just such a book in the proposal stage, currently making the rounds of various publishers, assuming any of them are wise enough to take me up on it.
And, yes, this time it really is personal.
And yet there are still Republicans out there thinking we should "reach across the aisle". The only thing we should reach across the aisle with is a nice card telling them to enjoy their unplanned retirement. :P
 Current Mood : relaxed  Tags : democrats, republican party, republicans, sarah palin Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
There, that should fill any quota necessary. :P
Seriously, people. It's time for a vacation. :)
 Current Mood : amused  Tags : just plain silly Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
I hope you are all having a great weekend!
 Current Mood : happy  Tags : holidays Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
Rich Sanchez says that Governor Palin is resigning because she's pregnant. Erik Nelson spewed a vile piece that was quickly taken down at the Huffington Post. But I'll reprint it here because people saved it before that happened.
In Sarah Palin's resignation announcement she complained about the treatment of her son Trig who always teaches her life lessons. She said that the "world needs more Trigs, not fewer." That's a presidential campaign promise we can all get behind. She will be the first politician to actually try to increase the population of retarded people. To me, it's kinda like saying the world needs more cancer patients because they teach us such personal lessons.
Her first act as President: To introduce a Pre-K lunch buffet that includes lead paint chips. Sort of a Large HEAD-START Program.
She will then encourage women to hold off on pregnancies until their 40's just to mix up some chromosomes.
She now is in favor of abortion only in case of diploid birth.
Her policies will increase jobs because Wal-Mart is building new stores each day and someone has to be the greeter.
This will lead to smaller government because fewer Americans will have the cognitive ability to hold a government job. There's more, of course. Suffice it to say that hypocrisy doesn't even begin to cover the hatred that the left unleashes on anyone who dares oppose them.
 Current Mood : determined  Tags : hate speech, msm, sarah palin Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
Well, that was unexpected. I'm sure the rabid left will crow that they successfully drove Governor Palin from the playing field. Of course if Republicans did anything like that it would be held up as proof that they were women hating, minority hating thugs.
I suspect we'll know "the rest of the story" in time.
In any event Sarah Palin has our thanks for leading the fight against socialism. I hope this is not the end of her career in politics.
 Current Mood : disappointed  Tags : sarah palin Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
Okay, it's a play on words because she really means "running" and not politics. It's from a story in Runner's World.
Which, I might add, doesn't have any unsubstantiated claims in it. Oh, and speaking of unsubstantiated allegations, does this sound like someone who is obsessed with their own fame and appearance?
When I run, I'm totally incognito because I'm not wearing the trough full of makeup. I can go running through a mob of tourists and they don't recognize me. Vanity Fair must be pretty embarrassed to have been outclassed by Runner's World.
And speaking of being outclassed, here's a tip for Katie Couric: when you ask a specific question you get a specific answer:
[Palin] ...You know, [former RW columnist] George Sheehan really could articulate what running means in terms of applicability to life. During the campaign, when people asked me about my favorite authors, I said C.S. Lewis, John Steinbeck, and Dr. George Sheehan, and people would look at me, these reporters, like who in the world is that. But his books and columns so inspired me 10, 15, 20 years ago, and still do. I remember what he wrote about applying the lessons of running to relationships and families and businesses and, in my case, running a state. He was a brilliant man.
[RW] Can you think of some specific passages you remember or lessons learned from his work?
[Palin] I remember reading one of his columns about the beauty of where he was running that day. And I thought how lucky I am to be in a place that has these protections of our environment and that has stuck with me ever since—to not take for granted that Alaska has such beauty to offer So yeah, apparently Couric is the only "journalist" who was never able to figure out a way to get Governor Palin to talk about her favorite authors. :D
 Current Mood : amused  Tags : sarah palin Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
This time in Vanity Fair.
The author of this alleged piece of journalism doesn't cite a single source. That's all you need to know about alleged journalist Todd Purdum and what he set out to achieve with what only be called a libelous, hate-filled hit piece masquerading as journalism.
Purdum tips his hand by using such obviously false constructs as claiming that multiple people looked up personality disorders in a book instead of just doing a web search. This is part of a heavy-handed attempt to link her to Richard Nixon, the "great Satan" of liberals who love to portray him as a psychotic.
Once again liberals project their own hate and psychological foibles onto others and claim that since they believe it, it must be true.
If I were Governor Palin I'd sue. She may be a public figure but the complete lack of cited sources and statements that say the opposite from people who are willing to go on the record is proof of malicious intent as far as I am concerned.
This is just more evidence that the left fears Governor Palin and will do anything, no matter how unethical or even illegal, in order to destroy her political career.
 Current Mood : determined  Tags : big lie, msm, sarah palin, scandals Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
It may not be ironic that a professional liar and personal attack artist has become a politician and won a seat in the Senate. Indeed some would argue that Al Franken is merely "rising" to his potential in that field.
It is however, a sad day for America. That such a vile piece of human scum is representing good, honest people is a tragedy.
Newly minted as a Senator, Franken is already one of the worst politicians ever. Born in scandal, his political career will surely end that way as well.
 Current Mood : sickened  Tags : al franken, minnesota, senate Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
Unlike his endless dithering over Iran and its elections, President Obama swiftly proclaimed his support for one side in the Honduras "is it a coup or counter-coup?" affair.
Unfortunately for Obama he came down on the wrong side of liberty.
The Honduran military moved to oust a President who was channeling Hugo Chavez (or Fidel Castro or just about any other socialist strong man) and attempting to use an illegal referendum to lend an air of legitimacy to his attempt to become "President for life".
This move was at odds with the Honduran courts, congress and even the sitting President's own political party.
So the military moved in and invited Manuel Zelaya to leave the country. (As in, not kill him!) They then oversaw the swearing in of the Speaker of the Honduran Parliament as interim President until the November elections.
Gee, sounds like a massive killing-fields meant to perpetuate an authoritarian regime. No, wait, that's Iran.
Obama is even at odds with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton who said the action was "not a coup".
Looks like Obama needs even more on the job training!
 Current Mood : amused  Tags : barack obama, hillary clinton, honduras, obama administration Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
Another victory for sanity in the Supreme Court. In a ruling that also reflects on nominee Sonia Sotomayor, the Supreme Court ruled that the city of New Haven could not scrap a test already taken by employees simply because no blacks would receive a promotion as a result.
Rejecting the notion of equality of outcomes the Supreme Court noted that the city failed to demonstrate that any discrimination had taken place.
WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court ruled Monday that white firefighters in New Haven, Conn., were unfairly denied promotions because of their race, reversing a decision that high court nominee Sonia Sotomayor endorsed as an appeals court judge.
The ruling could alter employment practices nationwide and make it harder to prove discrimination when there is no evidence it was intentional. Liberals, of course, both criticized the ruling (which is now precedent) and then claimed that Sotomayor "was only following precedent" when she joined a ruling rejecting the firefighter's claims. No word from Sotomayor on whether she will follow this precedent.
It's okay that Sotomayor was wrong; no judge has a perfect record. What's important is that she realizes why she was wrong and respects this ruling.
Speaking of which, Justice Ginsburg continues to demonstrate why she is the worst Justice currently on the bench. In her dissent she argued against a straw man:
In dissent, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said the white firefighters "understandably attract this court's sympathy. But they had no vested right to promotion. Nor have other persons received promotions in preference to them." The firefighters in question did not claim they had a "right" to a promotion. Indeed, their lawsuit argued they were denied a promotion that they had rightfully earned. And, of course, no one had been promoted because of the ongoing lawsuit. I would claim that Harvard (Ginsburg's law school) must be embarrassed by such nonsensical statements but I have a feeling that they agree with the notion of equality of outcomes and hold their own prejudices to be the "lawful kind".
 Current Mood : pleased  Tags : connecticut, discrimination, sonia sotomayor, supreme court Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
From her visit to Alaskan troops:

 Current Mood : amused  Tags : sarah palin Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
Alleged journalist Kevin O'Leary tells a few whoppers in his story about the current fiscal mess California finds itself in. Like a good little liberal robot he repeats the myth that is being spread by the left: that Proposition 13 (passed 30 years ago) is to blame for all of it.
Gosh, just what is this monstrous "Proposition 13"?
Why, it was a proposal that Californians voted on that made future tax hikes subject to a 2/3 vote in order to be passed.
That's it?
That's it.
No edicts to kill women, children, the elderly, the poor, minorities, glbts, etc?
Nope.
So..."why is it a problem?", you ask? Well, it's not! The liberals are just whining because they can't convince 2/3 of the state legislatures (who are being held "hostage" by their...constituents!) that tax hikes are a better way to solve the current problem than, say, spending cuts.
About now you must be thinking, "but I and every other household I know of cuts spending when income goes down." Yes, yes we do. But leftists believe that government is special. So special it deserves your money even when is hasn't earned it and (especially) when it has spent it so foolishly it finds itself in debt.
Not content with lying about Proposition 13 and the current fiscal crisis California finds itself in, O'Leary also tosses in some lies about Social Security being "assaulted" by "conservatives", Ronald Reagan being evil (what else?) because he outed welfare queens" (Dorothy Woods, anyone?) and whether the state should step in with guaranteed incomes for people who either can't work or choose not to work because money would be falling from the sky if those evil conservatives would simply agree to be taxed more.
O'Leary also fails to inform readers why Proposition 13 passed in the first place: because inflation and taxes tied to inflation (like property taxes) were eroding the wealth and incomes of people so quickly in the 1970s that they were getting poorer even while they made more money. To stop such insanity they made automatic tax hikes a thing of the past. And wouldn't you know it...California boomed for more than two decades before this allegedly caused a problem. And with that boom came...higher spending. Not just on residents and for residents but also on illegal aliens and for illegal aliens. What, O'Leary didn't mention that? I am shocked, shocked I say!
All in all, a typical article in a mainstream media publication! It states a conclusion that can't be supported by the facts, lies about the issues surrounding the matter, lies about more issues the author wishes to rant about and then tosses in some unrelated anecdotes in an attempt to pursued you by appealing to your emotional side.
That's pretty much the antithesis of real journalism.
 Current Mood : amused  Tags : big lie, california, dorothy woods, msm, ronald w. reagan, taxes, time magazine, welfare queens Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

|
|
 |
 |



|
 |
|