Skip to main content

Bernie Sander's Three Pillars: Democratic Socialism, Fascism, and Communism.

America is currently in the midst of one of the most partisan and vicious elections since Andrew Jackson's election campaign in the early 1800s. We aren't even to the general elections yet and already the rhetoric and tone of the primaries in both major parties has been vicious and full of mudslinging.

On the Republican side, Donald Trump has captured the Republican nomination in all but name, as every one of his sixteen opponents has been ground under the wheels of "The Donald's" rhetorically driven campaign. I personally have a considerable amount of distrust towards Mr. Trump, not so much towards what he says, as I find myself in considerable agreement with much of it, but because of his record of flip-flops and dishonesty.

However, Donald Trump has tapped into a great deal of the current frustration and anger that many in America feel today towards the political process and the establishment. If he is able to ride this wave into the Oval office, the American political scene and process will be changed permanently. The Republican party will be shattered and remade, possibly to an unrecognizable extent. Most likely, this would be an improvement.

However, the thrust of this article will be in another direction. The rise of Donald Trump has been mirrored by another outsider candidate, the so called "Democratic Socialist" Bernie Sanders. While Bernie Sanders will fail to win the Democratic primary, he will do so only because the Democratic party has carefully structured its primary system such that an outsider candidate cannot realistically win against the chosen candidate of the Democratic establishment.

The system of super-delegates that the Democratic party employees ensures that if any of the interest groups that comprise the uneasy Democratic coalition begin to wander off the reservation...they can be over ruled by supra-delegates, unelected and unbound.

But why does Bernie Sanders have such a hold on the liberal intelligentsia and young people? In short, Bernie Sanders represents the true dream of the American liberal. Hillary Clinton is the heir presumptive due to her husband and the usual "its her/his turn" that both parties like to follow when selecting their candidate, but Sanders is the candidate closest to the ideology that the American liberal left has consistently followed for over a century, that of socialism in any form whatsoever.

Socialism takes several forms: there is Sanders "benevolent" democratic socialism that seeks to do by vote what the other two forms of socialism beloved by liberals do by force, either naked or covertly. Fascism and Communism are the other two forms of socialism so beloved by liberals by the way, in case there was any confusion. Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, Lenin, were all at one time or another lionized by the liberal left and held up as examples of what America should be doing.

The end result of all three forms of socialism differs only in minute degrees. An all powerful government takes care of its populace, guarantees their jobs and pensions, guides the economy in whatever way is "best", and sticks its nose into every single facet of its members' business.  This is always accompanied by high levels of taxation and regulation, frequently approaching the confiscatory level. Entrepreneurship is discouraged and innovation is stifled. Massive sums of government monies are disbursed to pet projects. For Stalin it was Five Year Plans based around heavy industry, for Obama and his fellow socialists, its Green Energy and Solyndra. Ultimately its all our money of course, forcibly taken from us through Bastiat's legalized plunder

Its interesting to compare the economic points in the Nazi party platform (Remember, Nazi is an acronym for the National Socialist German Workers' Party) with Bernie Sanders' platform. Given that this is the internet, I have no doubt that some liberal will come along and start flinging crap over the idea that Bernie Sanders is a Nazi, so let me clarify what I am about to say. Bernie Sanders is a follower of socialism, according to his own words. Since Fascism and Communism are (broadly speaking, that corrupt and diseased tree has its roots at least as far back as Plato's Republic, written in 360 BC) close kin of socialism, it is interesting to see where fascism overlaps with Sanders' and his supporters' economic ideology. If the comparison offends you, than you are probably dumb enough to vote for him.

 Fascism is a mutable philosophy that varies from nation to nation, just as Communism does. In Italy and Germany the economics of fascism were very similar, while the racial aspects and nationalism were very different. At its core, Fascism is a "Third Way" an attempt to bridge between Marxist Communism and Capitalism. Read more on that here. And we all know(presumably at least...if you were public schooled you may not) the proverb about having your cake and eating it too. And since we are primarily concerned with economics right now, let's looks at a few points Sander's economic platform versus a few points of the Nazi economic platform as officially adopted and voted on and for by the German people.

(Nazi)We demand that the State shall above all undertake to ensure that every citizen shall have the possibility of living decently and earning a livelihood.
Minimum wage much? Point 5 of Sanders' economic platform calls for a livable wage through raising the minimum wage. The benevolent state can munificently guarantee that each of its citizens lives in a palatial abode with steak three times a day, and a new car in the garage, and all it takes is forcing companies to pay more.

As usual, Sanders' and his supporters are frighteningly ignorant of how a free market works. As labor becomes more expensive, employers use less of it. As the cost of a worker increases, he is far more likely to replaced by a machine, just as McDonald's and Wendy's's workers are about to find out. But don't worry, I am sure Sanders' has a government regulation to fix this. You see, government is like Aladdin's genie, only with unlimited wishes.
(Nazi) That all unearned income, and all income that does not arise from work, be abolished.
Point 12 of Sanders' program calls for a massive progressive tax hike to punish those that earn more. And one of his favorite bugaboos is the estate tax, which he wants to raise significantly in order to punish (my words) those who seek to pass along their wealth to their children.

Because after all, why should a father be able to pass along the fruit of his life's work to his son or daughter without the state getting a massive chunk of it. Why? Because the state is just so gosh-darned amazing and helpful that it deserves it!

(Nazi) We demand profit-sharing in large industries.
To a good socialist/fascist/communist profits are evil and suspect. After all, they always come at the expense of the little guy. Today's typical socialist's favorite target are the oil corporations. Because even though the government makes a whole lot more profit off of each gallon of gas via taxation than Exxon does...Exxon is an EEEEEVIL multi-national corporation. They probably drown babies too (seal babies, not humans. Democrats are fine with infanticide, just not infanticide of non-humans).
(Nazi)We demand a generous increase in old-age pensions.
Point 11 of Sanders' platform. "We must strengthen the social safety net, not weaken it. Instead of cutting Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and nutrition programs, we should be expanding these programs." 

Socialists love entitlements. Whether its Social Security, Medicare, or Medicaid, entitlements create large groups of voters with a vested interest in maintaining and increasing them. After all, when you rob Peter to pay Paul, you can always count on the support of Paul.

Of course to a good democratic socialist, entitlements are primarily made to gain votes, not help people. For example, Social Security is an entitlement to which you as the individual have no contractual right to get it paid back out to you. See Fleming v. Nestor. What entitlements do, is transfer wealth from the productive to the government, which can disburse it to favorite groups, usually while skimming a healthy bit off the top. And of course, getting more interest groups beholden to that sweet government hog trough.
(Nazi) We demand the creation and maintenance of a sound middle-class, the immediate communalization of large stores which will be rented cheaply to small tradespeople, and the strongest consideration must be given to ensure that small traders shall deliver the supplies needed by the State, the provinces and municipalities.
Oh the middle class, that favorite focus on paeans of praise from both sides. Interestingly, fascism breaks from its twin Communism here a bit, at least in rhetoric. Communism was heavily invested in destroying the middle class whereas fascism prefers to keep it around at least as a rhetorical concept to appeal to and a practical one to tax. One of the reasons why fascism tends to be somewhat more productive than communism.
(Nazi) In order to make it possible for every capable and industrious German to obtain higher education, and thus the opportunity to reach into positions of leadership, the State must assume the responsibility of organizing thoroughly the entire cultural system of the people. The curricula of all educational establishments shall be adapted to practical life. The conception of the State Idea (science of citizenship) must be taught in the schools from the very beginning. We demand that specially talented children of poor parents, whatever their station or occupation, be educated at the expense of the State.
Ah education! Part of the reason why socialism/communism/fascism holds so strongly a sway among the youth today is because the American educational establishment has been taken over almost entirely by proponents of those three ideologies.

Point 8 of Sanders' plan calls for free college for all. Leaving aside the colossal stupidity of trying to pay for all this with even more taxes (The tale of the Golden Goose comes to mind), education is an area that socialists have historically recognized as important to seize so that young minds can be force fed propaganda from their earliest and most mutable years.  The American education system was heavily shaped by socialists from the 1890's forward, with each generation getting less how to think and more what to think. Thanks to their generations long battle against creativity and rational thinking, Johnny now not only can't read, he can't think. But he will obediently vote Democrat (the former generally being a pre-requisite for voting Democrat).

(Nazi)We demand freedom for all religious faiths in the state, insofar as they do not endanger its existence or offend the moral and ethical sense of the Germanic race.
This isn't an economic point per se, but I couldn't resist pointing out a few things regarding liberals and freedom of religion.

The pro-forma freedom of religion that liberals are fond of claiming they are for is very similar to both the Soviet (Article 52 of the Soviet Constitution is a perfect Democratic piece of double-speak, Citizens of the USSR are guaranteed freedom of conscience, that is, the right to profess or not to profess any religion, and to conduct religious worship or atheistic propaganda) and the Fascist Nazi "freedom" quoted at the top of this section. And it uses very similar weasel words to what liberals use too. Liberals are all about freedom of long as they don't have to see it, hear it, experience it, or have any sign of its presence tangible or intangible.

Unless you are an Muslim of course. Then you are free to throw gays off buildings without a mutter of protest from any Democrat. However if you are a white Protestant who voted for California's Proposition 8 a few years ago(a proposition that passed I might add...democratically at that. But we already know that the Democratic party holds as illegitimate any democratic action that goes against what they want)...and you have the audacity to try to run a company such as oh say...the makers of an internet browser...then you will be publicly pilloried and destroyed.

Ultimately Bernie Sanders will be ushered of the Democratic party stage to make way for the Anointed Female, the One, the Only Hillary Clinton. But he has done the country an immeasurable service by ripping aside a great deal of the veil that the Democratic party tries to cloak itself with, revealing the true philosophical underpinnings of the Democrats and their supporters. They are proponents of an ideology as old as the Greek philosophers, supported by Plato and written against by Aristotle. An ideology that morally and economically burdens a country, frequently to the point of bankruptcy and misery, and one that espouses a vicious hatred for wealth and success.

For this reason, as flawed as he is of a candidate, I will vote for Donald Trump and work to hold him to his promises if he is elected. I may not know exactly what I am getting with Trump, but I know what either Hillary or Bernie will bring America.

America, make your choice and pick a road.


Popular posts from this blog

Partial Guide to Alt-Right Websites

Its an interesting time to be an American, especially if you are interested in politics and socioeconomics. The Internet has enabled many other-wise marginalized voices to be heard, and communities to sprout up around shared beliefs and goals.

One of the largest and fastest growing of these segments is the loose collection of websites known collectively as the "alt-right." While differing in many respects and exhibiting a tremendous degree of variety in their approach and tactics, the alt-right is largely unified around a respect for tradition and masculinity and is committed to largely libertarian ideals.  

There is much written that I do not endorse on these sites, but I do endorse a large portion of it and feel that Reality Hammer belongs in the same general political spectrum. Disagreements among intelligent men are nothing new, and are a very healthy thing, so long as these disagreements are carried on by rational adults who use the tools of logic to debate and disagre…

Fisking Sean Penn's Idiotic Editorial on Castro's Death

Today I was gifted with this astonishing (but not surprising) piece of idiocy from one of America’s foremost lovers of oppressive dictatorships and the men who run them, Comrade Sean Penn! He posted a rambling piece at the Daily Beast full of idiocy and whiney complaints about those MEANIES who were happy that Castro is dead. For good measure he doubled down about Castro: The Defender of The Poor People and the meanies who don’t like him. Those same MEANIES didn't vote for the Anointed Pantsuit either, and so Comrade Penn has a lot on his scrawny little libprog chest that he needs to get off. So let's have some fun!
My comments are in bold,Comrade Penn’s are initalics.
I was an American abroad, working overseas on this recent election night 2016. By midnight I was able to put myself to sleep, confidently, arrogantly, supremely certain that the election would go to Hillary Clinton, if not the Democrats at large.
Comrade Penn is kind enough to actually admit a by-now very evident t…

(Part 3): SJWs Have Always Lied. A Fisking of Soviet Civilization(1952) by Corliss Lamont

Continuing on with this massive fisking of Corliss Lamont’s 1952 book on the Soviet Union, this week’s installment is going to focus on Comrade Lamont’s explanation as to why Communism is a phenomenal system to live under and is totally different from fascism, which sucks to live under. It's a very nuanced interpretation of the two socialist philosophies and one that will require not only all of Comrade Lamont’s intellectual brainpower but also the complete ignorance and credulity of the reader. Let’s see how he does.

On Page 228, Comrade Lamont identifies ten “fundamental differences” between Soviet socialism and fascism. This is on the second page of the chapter and represents his efforts to set the tone for the remainder of the chapter. Essentially, if he can get the big whoppers swallowed first, the remaining smaller ones will go down easier. So let's take a look at the ten differences that Lamont claims separate the evils of totalitarian fascist socialism from the saintly …