Skip to main content

Guardians of the Galaxy: Volume 2, Movie Review


Guardians of the Galaxy was one of my favorite Marvel movies. In fact, I would even place it among my favorites. Its unique blend of roller coaster action, off the wall humor, stunning visuals and catchy beats was irresistible. This is remarkable because I remember seeing the trailer and thinking that Disney was scraping the bottom of the Marvel barrel. However, I really enjoyed Volume 1 despite my initial impression.

 The Guardians, headlined by Chris Pratt (as Star Lord), have excellent chemistry as they reprise their roles. The supporting cast is good as well, with Michael Rooker ( Yondu) leading the way. The action scenes are delightful and the eye popping visual scenery explodes across the screen. Like the first movie, the soundtrack contains the best of the 60's and 70's. This is one movie you really should see in theater to soak in the sights and sounds.

My only quibble with the film is that while the overall plot is quite good, some of the secondary plots seem a bit forced and designed to set up the next Marvel movies. The tone is slightly darker than the first one with the ending being a bit more melancholy due to the death of a character. However, the overall plot is good and explores families and how they interact. The characters all have touching and thoughtful moments to go with the action. There are still plenty of laughs and the movies tone is still brighter than many similar action packed movies.

Guardians of the Galaxy 2 does a great job and lives up to the hype created for it by the first move. It is almost as good as its predecessor and moves the franchise along nicely. It is interesting how this almost forgotten rag tag band of characters has become one of Marvel's best properties.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Partial Guide to Alt-Right Websites

Its an interesting time to be an American, especially if you are interested in politics and socioeconomics. The Internet has enabled many other-wise marginalized voices to be heard, and communities to sprout up around shared beliefs and goals.

One of the largest and fastest growing of these segments is the loose collection of websites known collectively as the "alt-right." While differing in many respects and exhibiting a tremendous degree of variety in their approach and tactics, the alt-right is largely unified around a respect for tradition and masculinity and is committed to largely libertarian ideals.  

There is much written that I do not endorse on these sites, but I do endorse a large portion of it and feel that Reality Hammer belongs in the same general political spectrum. Disagreements among intelligent men are nothing new, and are a very healthy thing, so long as these disagreements are carried on by rational adults who use the tools of logic to debate and disagre…

Fisking Sean Penn's Idiotic Editorial on Castro's Death

Today I was gifted with this astonishing (but not surprising) piece of idiocy from one of America’s foremost lovers of oppressive dictatorships and the men who run them, Comrade Sean Penn! He posted a rambling piece at the Daily Beast full of idiocy and whiney complaints about those MEANIES who were happy that Castro is dead. For good measure he doubled down about Castro: The Defender of The Poor People and the meanies who don’t like him. Those same MEANIES didn't vote for the Anointed Pantsuit either, and so Comrade Penn has a lot on his scrawny little libprog chest that he needs to get off. So let's have some fun!
My comments are in bold,Comrade Penn’s are initalics.
I was an American abroad, working overseas on this recent election night 2016. By midnight I was able to put myself to sleep, confidently, arrogantly, supremely certain that the election would go to Hillary Clinton, if not the Democrats at large.
Comrade Penn is kind enough to actually admit a by-now very evident t…

(Part 3): SJWs Have Always Lied. A Fisking of Soviet Civilization(1952) by Corliss Lamont

Continuing on with this massive fisking of Corliss Lamont’s 1952 book on the Soviet Union, this week’s installment is going to focus on Comrade Lamont’s explanation as to why Communism is a phenomenal system to live under and is totally different from fascism, which sucks to live under. It's a very nuanced interpretation of the two socialist philosophies and one that will require not only all of Comrade Lamont’s intellectual brainpower but also the complete ignorance and credulity of the reader. Let’s see how he does.

On Page 228, Comrade Lamont identifies ten “fundamental differences” between Soviet socialism and fascism. This is on the second page of the chapter and represents his efforts to set the tone for the remainder of the chapter. Essentially, if he can get the big whoppers swallowed first, the remaining smaller ones will go down easier. So let's take a look at the ten differences that Lamont claims separate the evils of totalitarian fascist socialism from the saintly …